DPDPA vs GDPR: 7 Key Differences
Explore the key differences between India's DPDPA and the EU's GDPR regarding data protection, consent rules, individual rights, enforcement, and penalties. Learn how these regulations impact businesses globally.
Save 90% on your legal bills

The Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) is India's new data protection law, while the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is the EU's landmark privacy regulation. Here are the key differences between the two:
Related video from YouTube
Geographic Scope
- DPDPA: Covers digital personal data processed within India or related to offering goods/services to individuals in India
- GDPR: Applies to processing of personal data of individuals residing in the European Union, regardless of the entity's location
Data Types Covered
- DPDPA: Regulates only digital personal data
- GDPR: Covers both digital and non-digital personal data
Key Terms
Term | DPDPA | GDPR |
---|---|---|
Entity Handling Data | Data Fiduciary | Data Controller |
Individual | Data Principal | Data Subject |
Individual Rights
- DPDPA: Data principals can access, correct, erase, and restrict processing of their personal data
- GDPR: Additional rights like data portability and objecting to automated decision-making
Consent Requirements
- DPDPA: Consent must be freely given, specific, informed, unconditional, and through clear action
- GDPR: Similar requirements, but does not explicitly mention the "unconditional" aspect
Cross-Border Data Transfers
- DPDPA: Transfers allowed to countries not on a restricted list
- GDPR: Strict rules requiring approved countries or safeguards like Standard Contractual Clauses
Enforcement and Penalties
- DPDPA: Maximum penalty of ₹500 crores ($61 million) or 4% of global turnover
- GDPR: Maximum penalty of €20 million or 4% of global turnover
While both regulations aim to protect personal data, the DPDPA and GDPR differ in their scope, terminology, individual rights, consent rules, data transfer requirements, and enforcement mechanisms.
sbb-itb-ea3f94f
Who and What is Covered
Geographic Reach
Regulation | Geographic Scope |
---|---|
DPDPA | - Applies to data processing within India, regardless of the data principal's nationality - Also covers data processing outside India if related to offering goods/services to individuals in India |
GDPR | - Applies to any entity processing personal data of individuals residing in the European Union, regardless of the entity's location - Covers data controllers and processors within the EU, as well as those outside the EU if they process data of EU residents |
The DPDPA and GDPR have a broad territorial reach, extending beyond their respective regions to ensure data protection standards are upheld globally.
Types of Data Covered
Regulation | Data Types Covered |
---|---|
DPDPA | - Regulates only digital personal data - Includes data collected digitally or non-digital data that has been digitized - Excludes personal data made publicly available by the data principal or under legal obligation |
GDPR | - Applies to both digital and non-digital personal data - Does not differentiate based on the format of personal data, as long as it relates to an identified or identifiable individual |
The GDPR covers a broader range of data types compared to the DPDPA, which is limited to digital personal data.
Key Terms Explained
The DPDPA and GDPR use different terms to refer to key entities and individuals involved in data processing. Understanding these terms is crucial for compliance.
Data Fiduciary vs. Data Controller
Term | Regulation | Definition and Role |
---|---|---|
Data Fiduciary | DPDPA | - Similar to a "data controller" under the GDPR - The entity that decides how and why personal data is processed - Responsible for following the DPDPA's requirements, including getting consent, implementing security measures, and enabling data principal rights |
Data Controller | GDPR | - Decides how and why personal data is processed - Bears primary responsibility for following the GDPR's requirements |
While the terms differ, both the "data fiduciary" under the DPDPA and the "data controller" under the GDPR refer to the entity that makes decisions about personal data processing.
Data Principal vs. Data Subject
Term | Regulation | Definition and Rights |
---|---|---|
Data Principal | DPDPA | - The individual whose personal data is collected and processed - Has rights to access, correct, erase, and restrict the processing of their personal data - Can appoint someone to exercise their rights if they die or become incapacitated |
Data Subject | GDPR | - The identified or identifiable individual whose personal data is processed - Has rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict processing, data portability, and object to processing of their personal data - Can exercise rights against both data controllers and data processors |
Both the DPDPA and GDPR aim to give individuals rights over their personal data. However, the GDPR provides more rights, such as data portability and objecting to automated decision-making.
Individual Rights
Access Personal Data
Both the DPDPA and GDPR allow individuals to request access to their personal data held by organizations:
Regulation | Right |
---|---|
DPDPA | Data principals can request access to their personal data from data fiduciaries. |
GDPR | Data subjects can obtain confirmation from data controllers on whether their personal data is being processed, and if so, access that data. |
Correct and Delete Personal Data
The regulations empower individuals to rectify inaccurate personal data and request erasure under certain circumstances:
Regulation | Rights |
---|---|
DPDPA | Data principals can request correction or deletion of their personal data from data fiduciaries. |
GDPR | Data subjects have the rights to rectification and erasure (the "right to be forgotten") of their personal data held by data controllers. |
Object to and Restrict Data Processing
Individuals can object to the processing of their personal data in specific situations:
Regulation | Rights |
---|---|
DPDPA | Data principals can object to the processing of their personal data by data fiduciaries. |
GDPR | - Data subjects can object to processing for direct marketing purposes. - They can also restrict processing in certain cases, such as when the accuracy of the data is contested. |
Additionally, the GDPR grants data subjects the right not to be subject to solely automated decision-making, including profiling, which significantly affects them. The DPDPA does not explicitly address this aspect, but grants minors the right to object to automated profiling.
Obligations for Data Handlers
Data Security Measures
Organizations must take steps to protect personal data from unauthorized access, loss, or damage.
Regulation | Security Requirements |
---|---|
DPDPA | Data fiduciaries (entities handling personal data) must put in place reasonable security safeguards. Specific rules on these safeguards will be provided by the Data Protection Board of India. |
GDPR | Data controllers and processors must implement appropriate technical and organizational measures to ensure a level of security suitable for the risk. This includes encryption, ensuring ongoing confidentiality and integrity of systems, and regular security testing. |
Breach Notification Requirements
In case of a personal data breach, organizations must notify authorities and affected individuals.
Regulation | Notification Requirements |
---|---|
DPDPA | Data fiduciaries must inform the Data Protection Board of India and affected data principals (individuals whose data was breached) about any personal data breach. The Board will then provide instructions on how to address the situation. |
GDPR | Data controllers must notify the supervisory authority within 72 hours of becoming aware of a personal data breach, unless the breach is unlikely to risk individuals' rights and freedoms. Affected data subjects must also be notified without delay if the breach is likely to result in a high risk to their rights and freedoms. |
Privacy by Design and Default
Regulation | Requirement |
---|---|
DPDPA | The law does not explicitly mention "privacy by design and default," but the Data Protection Board of India is expected to provide guidelines to ensure data protection is a fundamental consideration in the design and implementation of systems and processes. |
GDPR | The GDPR explicitly requires data protection by design and by default, meaning that data protection safeguards should be built into products and services from the earliest stage of development. |
Consent Rules
Valid Consent Requirements
For consent to be considered valid under the DPDPA, it must meet these conditions:
- Given freely: Consent cannot be forced or pressured. There should be no negative consequences for not providing consent.
- Specific: Consent must be given for the specific purpose of collecting and processing the personal data.
- Informed: Individuals must be provided clear information about the types of personal data collected, the purpose of processing, and any third parties involved.
- Unconditional: Consent cannot be a requirement for receiving services or benefits, except when data processing is necessary for the service.
- Clear action: Consent must be given through an affirmative action, such as ticking a box or providing a digital signature. Silence or inaction does not count as consent.
The GDPR has similar requirements for valid consent, including being freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous. However, the GDPR does not explicitly mention the "unconditional" aspect.
Children's Personal Data
Both regulations have specific rules for processing children's personal data:
Regulation | Age Limit | Requirement |
---|---|---|
DPDPA | Under 18 | Verifiable parental consent must be obtained from the child's parent or legal guardian before processing their personal data. |
GDPR | Under 16 (can vary between 13-16 based on EU member state laws) | Consent must be obtained from the child's parent or legal guardian. For children aged 16 and above, they can provide consent themselves. |
While the DPDPA sets a uniform age limit of 18 for obtaining parental consent, the GDPR allows for some flexibility based on the laws of individual EU member states.
Cross-Border Data Transfer Rules
GDPR's Data Transfer Requirements
The GDPR has strict rules for transferring personal data outside the European Union (EU) to ensure proper data protection:
- Approved Countries: The European Commission can decide if a non-EU country provides adequate data protection. If approved, personal data can flow freely to that country. Only a few countries like Switzerland, Canada, and New Zealand are currently approved.
-
Transfer Safeguards: If a country is not approved, organizations must use safeguards for transferring data outside the EU, such as:
Safeguard Description Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) Model data transfer clauses approved by the European Commission. Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs) Internal rules for multinational companies transferring data within their group. Approved Codes of Conduct and Certification Mechanisms Specific codes and certifications approved by the EU. - Consent or Other Exceptions: If no approved country or safeguards exist, organizations can rely on explicit consent from the individual or other exceptions specified in the GDPR, such as contractual necessity or legitimate interests.
DPDPA's Data Transfer Regulations
The DPDPA takes a different approach to cross-border data transfers:
- The Central Government will maintain a list of "notified countries" to which personal data transfers are restricted or prohibited.
- Data fiduciaries (entities processing personal data) can transfer data to any country not on the restricted list without additional safeguards.
- The DPDPA does not provide specific criteria for determining which countries will be on the restricted list, leaving this decision to the discretion of the Central Government.
This approach focuses more on governmental discretion to determine safe data transfer jurisdictions rather than imposing specific transfer mechanisms on organizations.
Enforcement and Penalties
Penalty Amounts
The DPDPA imposes much higher penalties for non-compliance compared to the GDPR:
Regulation | Maximum Penalty |
---|---|
DPDPA | Up to ₹500 crores (around $61 million) or 4% of a company's total worldwide turnover in the preceding financial year, whichever is higher |
GDPR | Up to €20 million or 4% of a company's total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher |
The DPDPA's maximum penalty of ₹500 crores (approximately $61 million) is significantly higher than the GDPR's €20 million cap. This shows India's strong intent to enforce strict compliance with its data protection rules.
Enforcement Authorities
DPDPA: The Data Protection Board of India is the main enforcement authority under the DPDPA. Its key responsibilities include:
- Monitoring and enforcing compliance with the DPDPA
- Investigating data breaches and non-compliance cases
- Addressing grievances from individuals (data principals)
- Issuing orders, codes of practice, and guidelines
- Imposing penalties for violations
GDPR: The GDPR relies on a decentralized enforcement model with Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) in each EU member state. These DPAs have regulatory and investigative powers, such as:
- Conducting audits and investigations
- Issuing warnings and reprimands
- Imposing administrative fines
- Suspending data transfers to other countries
- Approving binding corporate rules and codes of conduct
While the Data Protection Board in India has a centralized mandate, the GDPR's enforcement is carried out by individual national DPAs across the EU.
Conclusion
Key Differences in a Nutshell
- Scope: GDPR covers personal data of EU residents globally, while DPDPA focuses on digital personal data processed within or related to India.
- Terminology: GDPR uses "data controller" and "data subject," DPDPA refers to "data fiduciary" and "data principal."
- Legal Bases: GDPR allows six lawful bases for processing, including legitimate interests, while DPDPA only permits consent or "legitimate uses."
- Individual Rights: GDPR grants rights like data portability and automated decision-making objection, not explicitly covered under DPDPA.
- Consent Requirements: Both require specific, informed consent, but DPDPA may allow for less granular consent compared to GDPR.
- Data Transfers: GDPR has stricter rules for cross-border transfers, while DPDPA is more lenient initially.
- Penalties: DPDPA imposes significantly higher maximum penalties (up to ₹500 crores or $61 million) compared to GDPR's €20 million cap.
Compliance Considerations for Businesses
- Organizations operating in India, the EU, or both regions must implement robust compliance programs to meet the respective regulations.
- Review data handling practices, including collection, processing, storage, and transfer mechanisms.
- Revise consent management processes, particularly for businesses relying on GDPR's "legitimate interests" basis, which is not a valid legal ground under DPDPA.
- Establish data breach notification and grievance redressal procedures to comply with DPDPA's stringent requirements.
- Companies classified as "significant data fiduciaries" under DPDPA must appoint independent auditors and conduct data protection impact assessments.
- Multinational organizations should adopt a comprehensive, harmonized approach to data protection, considering the highest standards across regions.
- Conduct regular employee training, audits, and risk assessments to maintain ongoing compliance and mitigate potential penalties.
Key Aspect | DPDPA | GDPR |
---|---|---|
Scope | Covers digital personal data processed within or related to India | Covers personal data of EU residents globally |
Terminology | "Data fiduciary" and "data principal" | "Data controller" and "data subject" |
Legal Bases | Consent or "legitimate uses" | Six lawful bases, including legitimate interests |
Individual Rights | Does not explicitly cover data portability or automated decision-making objection | Grants rights like data portability and automated decision-making objection |
Consent Requirements | May allow for less granular consent compared to GDPR | Requires specific, informed, and unambiguous consent |
Data Transfers | More lenient initially, with restricted countries list | Strict rules for transfers outside EU, requiring approved countries or safeguards |
Maximum Penalty | Up to ₹500 crores ($61 million) or 4% of global turnover | Up to €20 million or 4% of global turnover |